"Les said he's not opposed to Metro Vancouver burning garbage in Gold River on Vancouver Island—the site of one proposal before the regional district. That's because this project wouldn't share the same airshed as residents of the Fraser Valley."
--Not at all I don't see this quoted statement from the article as being divisive at all... He doesn't really care about the environment just doesn't want it in his back yard.. I think that is consistent with current Liberal policy to keep your own selected clients happy at the expense of others.
--If burning of garbage is bad it is bad no matter where you put it. I have heard the argument that they are using state of the art technology of the day but there is significant debate that the best technology of the day is still not acceptable.
--This kinda smells like the Weyerhaeuser pulp mill stack in Kamloops which was to have no odor or nasty pollutants given they were going to use the best technology of the day.
-- Or the sewage odourless treatment Plant in Penticton that is state of the art . I believe one of the better decisions made by the Penticton Indian band was to not accept the plant on the Res and let Penticton build it on their own land if it was going to be so good it should not be a problem to keep it in Penticton..
I think we can all agree that burning garbage is bad!
Suggesting John less doesn't care about the environment he lives in is just ridiculous! (I can't believe I'm defending John Les!
)
What do you suggest we do with it? Pile it up? Dump it in the ocean?
The best solution would be to stop people from making garbage, but I'm sure we are all realistic enough to know that wouldn't work.
Burning garbage is the most realistic solution, and burning it in an area that disperses the pollutants better, like on the island is better than burning garbage in the Fraser Valley tunnel.....