Fishing with Rod Discussion Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

Author Topic: Lower fraser  (Read 18166 times)

CohoJake

  • Old Timer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 727
Re: Lower fraser
« Reply #30 on: August 26, 2015, 09:11:59 AM »


Raining does not cause migrating sockeye to multiply. Although I wish it did...
One still leading theory is that high water temps cause the sockeye to defer returning for one year, causing the next year's run to have more 5 year fish.  Rain could lower water temps and coax more fish to return rather than defer.
Logged

clarki

  • Old Timer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2050
Re: Lower fraser
« Reply #31 on: August 26, 2015, 09:28:36 AM »

None of this makes any sense to me but the DFO and PSC know best right?

Unless you have expertise in international relations, political science (including lobbying), stakeholder engagement (including First Nations), economics, fisheries science (including run forecasting), resource allocation and law enforcement, then maybe they do know best.

It's a big world out there and it's hard to understand the complexity of the issues from just a single perspective.

While I hope to be able to fish for pink salmon in the Fraser, I choose to focus on the angling opportunities that I do have, rather than the ones I don't.

And that's my self righteous soapbox for the day :)     
Logged

Derp

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 492
  • Tight lines!
Re: Lower fraser
« Reply #32 on: August 26, 2015, 10:09:50 AM »

Unless you have expertise in international relations, political science (including lobbying), stakeholder engagement (including First Nations), economics, fisheries science (including run forecasting), resource allocation and law enforcement, then maybe they do know best.

It's a big world out there and it's hard to understand the complexity of the issues from just a single perspective.

While I hope to be able to fish for pink salmon in the Fraser, I choose to focus on the angling opportunities that I do have, rather than the ones I don't.

And that's my self righteous soapbox for the day :)     

Yeah, lets never question the DFO's actions and trust the govt fully with our natural resources...seems legit
« Last Edit: August 26, 2015, 10:11:35 AM by Derp »
Logged
In the summertime when the weather is hot
You can stretch right up and touch the sky
When the weather's fine
You got women, you got women on your mind
Have a drink, have a drive
Go out and see what you can find

sg6804

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 24
Re: Lower fraser
« Reply #33 on: August 26, 2015, 11:47:51 AM »

Unfortunately i don't have the qualifications you listed ,however i have emailed the DFO several times asking how the system works and why they have closed the tidal Fraser to sport fishing , No answer to me emails , In my opinion the system is broken and needs to be changed . Do i have all answers on how to fix it    No i do not ,  But I do  believe that if the river is closed it should be closed for all user groups , if it is open then it is open for all user groups ,i find it very frustrating that some groups can fish for salmon when we cant as sport fishing is the lowest impact to sockeye in the tidal Fraser

Just to add I have been fishing the Lower Fraser all year for Sturgeon  when i have not been up at the lakes in Kamloops , Last night was beautiful out on the Fraser between Golden Ears Bridge and mission , It was nice to see the amount of salmon boiling and jumping in that part of river as its the  most i have seen all summer

Cheers

Logged

Apennock

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 157
Re: Lower fraser
« Reply #34 on: August 26, 2015, 12:54:43 PM »

Yeah, lets never question the DFO's actions and trust the govt fully with our natural resources...seems legit

Feel free to question government and regulatory bodies but to outright discount what they're saying with the evidence and data that they base their decision on vs. what "makes sense to [you]" is unproductive and a little ridiculous.
Logged

Derp

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 492
  • Tight lines!
Re: Lower fraser
« Reply #35 on: August 26, 2015, 01:07:07 PM »

Feel free to question government and regulatory bodies but to outright discount what they're saying with the evidence and data that they base their decision on vs. what "makes sense to [you]" is unproductive and a little ridiculous.

Unless something new has come up regarding this subject, I and others as stated above would love to see DFO's "evidence and data that they base their decision" to close the lower Fraser to us sporties
« Last Edit: August 26, 2015, 01:11:45 PM by Derp »
Logged
In the summertime when the weather is hot
You can stretch right up and touch the sky
When the weather's fine
You got women, you got women on your mind
Have a drink, have a drive
Go out and see what you can find

Derp

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 492
  • Tight lines!
Re: Lower fraser
« Reply #36 on: August 26, 2015, 01:07:54 PM »

having said all this, i think it's too early for us to freak out as the pinks haven't even started to push in any real numbers. So i'll have to chill  8)
« Last Edit: August 26, 2015, 01:10:56 PM by Derp »
Logged
In the summertime when the weather is hot
You can stretch right up and touch the sky
When the weather's fine
You got women, you got women on your mind
Have a drink, have a drive
Go out and see what you can find

Drewhill

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 367
Re: Lower fraser
« Reply #37 on: August 26, 2015, 06:57:31 PM »

I've already seen multiple guys fishing the lower fraser. Before I've let them know the river is closed I've asked them how it's been to get a bit more of an honest answer and nobody has yet to hit anything. Don't think we're missing out on anything yet.
Logged

juno

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 43
Re: Lower fraser
« Reply #38 on: August 26, 2015, 07:23:09 PM »

Yeah, lets never question the DFO's actions and trust the govt fully with our natural resources...seems legit   Who's gonna vote harper in again?  not  me
Logged

BCfisherman97

  • Old Timer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1019
Re: Lower fraser
« Reply #39 on: August 26, 2015, 09:32:22 PM »

Lots of pinks jumping in burnaby area today
Logged

Tenz85

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 262
Re: Lower fraser
« Reply #40 on: August 26, 2015, 11:04:27 PM »

Has the lower fraser ever been open more than a few days while the upper is closed?
« Last Edit: August 26, 2015, 11:06:59 PM by Tenz85 »
Logged

Zackattack

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 185
Re: Lower fraser
« Reply #41 on: August 26, 2015, 11:20:10 PM »

Yeah, lets never question the DFO's actions and trust the govt fully with our natural resources...seems legit   Who's gonna vote harper in again?  not  me

Never voted him in before. Surely won't now. What a clown.
Logged