I will not be attending due to personal matters. If I am going, I would be an observer from the sideline.
While the intention of the protest seems good, you have to question what are the consequences of the approach that is being taken. Will this damage the relationship between FOC and SDA further? What happens when SDA and other groups return to the meeting table? Will sportfishers' still be able to voice strongly as before?
I've never really believed in protests, especially when it involves breaking the law, overall it does not produce result except stirring up the anger some more. A better approach would be to push for more changes on the negotiating table.
I wonder how good this is going to look in the media when Bill landed that fish as everyone else cheered on. This is quite serious, and risky. The way the media portrait the protest may either gain support from the public or completely damage its public relationship.
And please, those who are going from the website, you're not representing FWR if you are being interviewed. FWR is simply a business, not an organization that has a mission statement. FWR does not support or condemn the protest, we are simply broadcasting it as a media outlet to let people know what is going on.