Fishing with Rod Discussion Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

Author Topic: Treaty is a blow to Fraser sockeye inquiry  (Read 3423 times)

alwaysfishn

  • Old Timer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2364
Treaty is a blow to Fraser sockeye inquiry
« on: February 10, 2010, 07:20:08 PM »

MP worried that Yale agreement will compromise Justice Cohen's efforts to improve fisheries management
John Cummins, The Delta Optimist
Published: Wednesday, February 10, 2010

The inquiry into the decline of the Fraser River sockeye fishery was a hopeful sign the federal government placed a high priority on correcting problems in the management of the fishery.

Mr. Justice Cohen was directed to examine the management of the Fraser River sockeye fishery and to develop recommendations on "changes to the policies, practices and procedures of the department in relation to the management of the Fraser River sockeye salmon fishery."

At the very moment the judicial inquiry is set to undertake a groundbreaking evaluation and assessment of fisheries management practices, including monitoring and enforcement, and to recommend to the prime minister necessary changes to fisheries management practices, the minister of Indian affairs signs a treaty to transfer fisheries management authority to the Yale Indian Band.

The Yale final agreement will compromise every conceivable aspect of fisheries management, from monitoring and enforcement to who will have access to Fraser River sockeye.

The treaty will deal with the very fisheries management issues the Cohen Inquiry must address and will move them behind a constitutional wall where neither the inquiry's investigation nor final recommendations can touch them.

If the government were serious about the Cohen Inquiry and its mandate to review fisheries management, the minister would not have signed a treaty that fundamentally and permanently alters fisheries management before Cohen has yet to hold his first public hearing.

Regrettably, the initialing of the Yale final agreement compromises the inquiry and undermines its final recommendation to the prime minister.

Fishermen assumed the judicial inquiry represented their last chance to inject common sense into fisheries management. Many will now conclude the Yale agreement, which expands native fishing in the Fraser Canyon and places in it in constitutional cement, together with the other treaties in the pipeline will interfere with or limit Justice Cohen's work.

With the signing of the treaty fishermen believe the government has made clear its intention to continue the very fisheries management practices that have devastated the Fraser sockeye fishery.

British Columbians are left to wonder the extent to which the Yale and other treaties yet to be signed will fetter the work of the Cohen Inquiry and limit the scope and worth of its recommendations.

The initialing of the Yale treaty is certainly not a hopeful indicator for either the Cohen Inquiry or for the government's desire for, or commitment to, making fundamental changes in fisheries management.

http://www2.canada.com/deltaoptimist/news/story.html?id=7d38b0f6-aa46-41e1-ae51-dab72477c0ca

© The Delta Optimist 2010
Logged
Disclosure:  This post has not been approved by the feedlot boys, therefore will likely be found to contain errors and statements that are out of context. :-[

chris gadsden

  • Old Timer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 13952
Re: Treaty is a blow to Fraser sockeye inquiry
« Reply #1 on: February 10, 2010, 09:02:50 PM »

The Stolo Nation will be challenging this so it most likely will end up in court in the near future.

alwaysfishn

  • Old Timer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2364
Re: Treaty is a blow to Fraser sockeye inquiry
« Reply #2 on: February 11, 2010, 08:00:52 AM »

If the Federal Government was really serious about getting to the bottom of the sockeye disappearance they wouldn't be pushing to off load the management of this fishery to the Indian Bands.

Whether it is thrown out in court doesn't change the governments attitude about the problem.

I think the Feds are resigned to to fact the sockeye will disappear and are looking for ways to shift the responsibility before that happens.

That I believe is the point of Cummin's article
Logged
Disclosure:  This post has not been approved by the feedlot boys, therefore will likely be found to contain errors and statements that are out of context. :-[