Fishing with Rod Discussion Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

Author Topic: wool vs roe  (Read 5797 times)

zimmer

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 11
    • One Percent Realty Ltd
wool vs roe
« on: October 10, 2005, 06:05:12 PM »
I seem to have pretty good luck with wool

What is the advantage of Roe?
Logged
Zimmer

Fish Assassin

  • Old Timer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 10839
Re: wool vs roe
« Reply #1 on: October 10, 2005, 06:32:23 PM »
It has scent which is a big advantage when you're fishing murky waters.
Logged

bentrod

  • Old Timer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 996
Re: wool vs roe
« Reply #2 on: October 10, 2005, 07:33:32 PM »
Wool is good for current and non-finicky fish.  Roe is also nice if you're slow on the trigger.  The fish seem to hold onto it a little longer. 
Logged

Floater

  • Old Timer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1130
Re: wool vs roe
« Reply #3 on: October 10, 2005, 08:50:04 PM »
Quote from: C.F on October 10, 2005, 07:54:58 PM
Each has it time and place!

Roe doesnt work all the time and same with wool!


Wool is nice as you dont smell like a fish plant at the end of the day!


C.F
Thats why you allways have a towel and a bait box with you. ;D
Logged
[

Gillie

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 63
Re: wool vs roe
« Reply #4 on: October 10, 2005, 08:53:22 PM »
Still end up smelly, especially if your Making big sturgie bags
Logged

James

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 325
Re: wool vs roe
« Reply #5 on: October 11, 2005, 12:02:59 AM »
Like said above each has it's time and place , But I like to use Wool trimmed very neat to the size of 1 egg , then dab some scent on it every couple of casts .
Logged