I agree that talking about it may cause some fishermen to evolve to finer forms of sports fishing. However potential for arguments still exist between the fly fisherman and the bait fishermen, between the sinking fly line fisherman and the floating line fly fisherman, etc, etc. Why not just let people fish?
The point is that there are all sorts of ways to catch fish. As long as they are legal; using a net, or a long line, or a hunk of roe, or a fly line is just a preferred way of catching a fish. Neither is better or worse, ethical or non-ethical.
Perhaps a flosser turned bar fishermen, could be compared to a smoker turned non-smoker who goes on a crusade to convince the world that smoking is bad for you..... Maybe it is, but why do so many people do it???
I am trying to wrote the journal as making too many posts tonight on several topics
but if you ask why so many floss. One, because their dentist says to
and the other is because it is easy to catch fish, no skill or learning curve needed. Just buy a cheap rod, reel, hooks (no wool or corkie needed), an array of betties, lots of leader material as you need 12 to 20 feet and away you go.
Why do people smoke? Is it because people think it looks cool or is it to relieve tension. Better to go bar fishing as it very relaxing, you can even catch up on your rest while flossing is combat fishing during the sockeye mayham that can turn into the world of boxing and wrestling.
I will leave it here, even though once a flosser does not mean you will be one forever. Hey, you might even change your thoughts on the HST.
I will write a story that happened to a bar fisher yesterday watch for this story in General D..
That's after a coffee break, (at this hour?) no, not a smoke break.