I’ll have to finally bite on this one.
So, lets see if I have this right...if one suspects that a kid may have committed a criminal act and stolen your bike, then one should:
setup a Facebook page in the kid's name and load it with all sorts of incriminating info-doesn't have to be true
Basically defame him. An eye for an eye. He (maybe) broke the law, so you should (definitely) break the law in response. This is okay, because:
single mothers financing defamation lawsuits is outside the realm of possibility.
Anotherwords, they don’t have the money to fight back. The buggers. I hate poor people too.
In addition:
go and beat on their front door then their back door, hassle, hassle/hassle/hassle the punk-tell his Mother you know what he's up to and call him every name in the book...If she's renting complain long and hard to their landlord and keep doing it.
Another words, try to get the single mother who:
“most likely doesn't have a dime to her name,”
...evicted. Good riddance!
Afer all, one should:
Never give a known thief an even break-NEVER he's not treating the people he steals from fairly and deserves nothing but the worst sort of treatment.
Because if someone told you he stole something before, then it MUST have been him. In addition, if he did something wrong once, then he is most certainly a criminal for life.
Perhaps it is just me, but this seems a little misguided. While I’m sure that you, like the Right Honourable Brian Mulroney, have “never knowingly done anything wrong in [your] entire life”, I might suggest that acting in such a manner towards someone that you merely suspect may have done something wrong—merely because, as you acknowledge, they do not have the resources to fight back-- is nothing more than misguided bullying which will cause more harm than good.