Any opinions on the quality of chum?
I went out fishing today and landed an exceptionally bright chum. Normally I return these back to the river but this time I decided to make an exception because it looked like a better than usual quality doe and my wife and I love Ikura (roe). My wife was not keen on keeping the fish for anything other than the Ikura but I will not kill a fish simply for it's roe - that just seems horribly wasteful and sad to me. I convinced her to give it a try.
Anyway we got home, cut it all up and prepared the Ikura. Fortunately for me, my wife, being Japanese, is exceptionally good at preparing fish and the Roe for eating. (She strongly resists my attempts to pilfer roe for bait but I managed to talk her into letting me keep some aside for that purpose
) Anyway I have a point:
When the meal was prepared and we popped that fish into our mouths we were amazed! This fish was way better than expected - definitely superior to pink [I would even venture to say that it was comparable to springs but i have never eaten a freshly caught spring]. The texture was nice and firm and the meat just flakes away when cut. Why does this fish have such a poor reputation as valid table fare? (Names like "Dog Salmon" immediately jump to mind when I think of these fish - not a name that whets my appetite much. )
In fact the fish exceeded expectations so much, my wife is starting to wonder if we really got a chum. I know it was on account of the vertical blue bars on it's body (..it was just starting to change color).
Here are some photos:
(Before cooking we just rubbed it over with salt to remove the sliminess then rubbed it over with white wine to remove any odor. After that it was just grilled with dill and a slightly spicy seasoning mix - it didn't really need much.)
http://www.fishingwithrod.com/member/gallery/fishseeker/Ikua_smallhttp://www.fishingwithrod.com/member/gallery/fishseeker/tasty_chum_smal