Fishing with Rod Discussion Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

Author Topic: Fraser River Sockeye Inquiry  (Read 3405 times)

bluenoser

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 226
Fraser River Sockeye Inquiry
« on: November 06, 2009, 08:54:08 AM »

Heard on the radio that Harper announced a Fraser River Sockeye inquiry.

Can they really learn anything valuable from this? If they can then ok.

With so many cut backs to other things...won't this be a waste of taxpayer money....our money.
Logged

Terry Bodman

  • Old Timer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 947
  • A poorly tied fly is better than no fly at all!
Re: Fraser River Sockeye Inquiry
« Reply #1 on: November 06, 2009, 09:09:30 AM »

Yes, a judicial inquiry is expensive. However, also expensive not only economically but also environmentally is a disappearing salmon stock. Personally, I don't expect concrete answers from this process as finding reasons for disappearing fish stocks is a very complicated process. It is time though for DFO officials and hopefully some BC MLA's to be forced to testify UNDER OATH. This could be the most valuable part of the process.
Logged
"One man of courage makes a majority"

Terry D

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 177
  • Carp are sportfish too!!!
Re: Fraser River Sockeye Inquiry
« Reply #2 on: November 06, 2009, 09:30:35 AM »

It's a good start, but I think we'll have to wait until we find out the whole scope of the inquiry first.
Logged

Fish Assassin

  • Old Timer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 10839
Re: Fraser River Sockeye Inquiry
« Reply #3 on: November 06, 2009, 10:03:08 AM »

It is time though for DFO officials and hopefully some BC MLA's to be forced to testify UNDER OATH. This could be the most valuable part of the process.

Absolutely
Logged

dennyman

  • Old Timer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 614
Re: Fraser River Sockeye Inquiry
« Reply #4 on: November 06, 2009, 11:20:15 AM »

The sad part of it all though may be for the Sockeye salmon it could be too little, too late. After all how many bad runs in a row have we had now.  Fisheries biologists have warned the bureaucrats that there is a minimum number of sockeye needed to insure a good carryover.  Hopefully a concrete plan is put in place and people follow through on them to ensure the survival of the Sockeye for future generations.
Logged