Excellent responses so far. I added a poll to the thread later on yesterday after putting this post up so in case you missed it earlier, please vote. There are quite a few individuals who voted "poor", but failed to explain why it is poor and what improvements are needed by making a reply.
By lowering the daily quota and implementing the age restriction, it would unlikely deter those who wish to take more than their shares of fish home if you observe who were the majority usually taking part in this violation. Again, two components are needed continuously to increase compliance - education and enforcement. This particular topic has been an email discussion on and off among individuals myself, MoE staff and FFSBC staff because we get reports from stocking staff, creel surveyors, park staff on how much non-compliance there are. There is a plan to have an one or two-page introductory sheet available for entry level anglers to bring along when visiting these "Fishing in the City" lakes. This would make sure new anglers are well aware of what they can and cannot do before wetting a line. For those who continue to disregard our regulations, your best option right now is still calling the RAPP line. Even if conservation officers are unable to attend, frequencies of reports give them a better understanding on where most violations are taking place. This really helps them on determining how their patrol time and effort should be allocated.
What influence the quality of your trip to these lakes? The venue (scenery, tidiness, facilities?), the fish (number of fish caught, number of fish allowed for keeping, size of the fish?), the nearby participants (general atmosphere, compliance, angling behaviour?)?
Unlike previous years, I updated the stocking reports once every week (near the end of each week) instead of providing immediate updates. Is this preferred?