Fishing with Rod Discussion Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

Author Topic: Seymour River Losers  (Read 12377 times)

JPW

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 109
Re: Seymour River Losers
« Reply #15 on: September 16, 2011, 09:35:14 PM »
Isn't the tidal boundary below the CNR bridge anyway? Snagging or not, they can't keep any pink in the non-tidal seymour; can they?
Logged

Fish Assassin

  • Old Timer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 10839
Re: Seymour River Losers
« Reply #16 on: September 16, 2011, 10:11:06 PM »
Quote from: JPW on September 16, 2011, 09:35:14 PM
Isn't the tidal boundary below the CNR bridge anyway? Snagging or not, they can't keep any pink in the non-tidal seymour; can they?

Non-retentiion in non-tidal section
Logged

JPW

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 109
Re: Seymour River Losers
« Reply #17 on: September 17, 2011, 05:09:03 PM »
Quote from: Fish Assassin on September 16, 2011, 10:11:06 PM
Non-retentiion in non-tidal section

Right so snagging or not seems like anyone targeting pink would be something easily enforced by a C/O?
Logged

Fish Assassin

  • Old Timer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 10839
Re: Seymour River Losers
« Reply #18 on: September 17, 2011, 09:00:05 PM »
You can still fish but can't retain any.
Logged

Ed

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 326
  • I'm a llama!
Re: Seymour River Losers
« Reply #19 on: September 30, 2011, 02:52:13 PM »
Were they FN or regular fishermen? Im pretty sure there are reserves in that area.
Logged

nickredway

  • Old Timer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 616
Re: Seymour River Losers
« Reply #20 on: September 30, 2011, 08:31:36 PM »
This thread is only good for two things, people patting themselves on the back for how ethical they are and giving every other snagger reading this a fresh place to ply their trade IMO.
Logged