Though the photo was unnecessary, I can't say that I see the article as reveling or expressing glee about the possible failure of the company. It appears to be chiding those who insisted that this promoter had the solution to closed containment that farms refused to acknowledge was possible.
There has been a trail of information on the company available starting with the financial and operating results of the initial trial operations at the tank facility in Cedar and carried forward by the promotional publicity releases and the financial statements of the company. Anyone who knows the principals involved, understands the requirements of closed containment and has followed that trail of information knows that bankruptcy is the inevitable end, if not right now than sometime in the not too distant future. Stock market promotion and scientific development are very uncomfortable bedfellows.
That information details how well over $20 million in grant money and shareholder investment was consumed just getting one tank set up and operating to initiate the first, incomplete trial production cycle at the Middle Bay facility. That should have been accomplished on less than a quarter of that investment. It has been apparent to anyone who understands closed containment technology that the advancement of that technology has not been the first priority of the company; that these people were just repeating previous failed experiments with minor variations, eg. hard wall tanks instead of soft wall and selling the repetition as a bold new frontier.
An outfit like Silver Springs in Washington that actually focuses on raising fish deserves far more credit as actually doing something to advance the technology. Agrimarine has focused on raising money and it's scattergun business plan hasn't accomplished anything useful. Like the tank farm in Cedar, there is no doubt it's operations will eventually fail when the money runs out leaving behind a string of unpaid debt and a number of investors left poorer for it's existence.