Thanks for mentioning that, Dave. If we are going to talk about “abysmal” returns that followed 2002 we also need to consider the odd and even life history of Pink Salmon when making comparisons. In the case of Mainland Inlet Pink stocks the even year appears to be the dominant. Secondly, while I agree that an effort was made to minimize the sea lice levels (Broughton Sea Lice Monitoring Plan 2003) following 2002, if we are going to talk about what happened after 2002, we also need to look at the long term Pink escapement in the Broughton area. The fact is that they have fluctuated with some big years and some years with some very poor returns – even before salmon farming. Thirdly, if we are going to talk about what happened during and after 2002, we also need to consider that the farm source sea lice was actually greater during the 2000 pink salmon outmigration which came back as a record return just a year prior to the collapse in 2002. Lastly, Pink Salmon are actually increasing in abundance in the North Pacific. The potential for competition with Sockeye was mentioned in the Final Report.
Krkosek et al 2007 used too small of a time range which ultimately didn’t show what was actually happening. How can you take a snap shot over a short period of time and predict local extinction? During the inquiry, Josh Korman even alluded to the low statistical power in the fish health data because it is only available from 2003 to 2010. Ultimately, longer term data sets are going to be needed and this is what Cohen put in his recommendations. This seems to be a common theme for most of the 75 recommendations. In Cohen’s Final Report, the consensus was that sea lice did not act alone to cause the decline of Fraser Sockeye; however, Cohen believes that sea lice could have acted in combination with other stressors to contribute to the decline. The debate has been how much – some say it is low while others say it is much more than that. When reading Cohen’s findings, it seems that governmental and non-governmental biologists seem to agree on what research is required from this point forward (for the most part anyway).