(Sigh)…….The point being made was that it was funny that antis were coming up with their own conspiracy theory regarding the OIE reference lab in Norway after complaining about similar conspiracy theories labelled against Ms Morton regarding spreading ISA infected fish. If the conspiracy theories alleged against Ms Morton were so outrageous then why come up with more conspiracy theories against the other OIE reference laboratory which have no factual basis? I thought two wrongs don’t make a right….lol. Antis should realize that they are basically knocking the OIE when they do this – the same organization they have been turning to for validation of their claims. As for conspiracy theories against the CFIA in the media article posted it seems as though only one side of the story is being displayed. This is where it is better to go to the actual testimony during the Cohen Inquiry. Again, the OIE is the one taking action in regard to the AVC lab in PEI. Even Don Reynolds, dean of the AVC, is quoted as saying that it was the OIE that made the recommendation to suspend the designation.
http://www.vancouversun.com/health/Audit+Atlantic+Veterinary+College+sparked+foreign+complaint/7603199/story.htmlSecondly, Dr. Kibenge did not find ISA in fish samples from BC waters. One is the virus and the other is the disease. Kibenge believes that the ISAV found to date here are ISA virus sequences or ISA virus-like. As of December 2011, according to Cohen, there is no evidence that the fish tested suffered from ISA.
“As stated in Volume 1, Chapter 9, Fish health management, I find that the evidence does not allow me to conclude whether ISAv or an ISAv-like virus currently exists in Fraser River sockeye. However, I accept the opinion of the expert panel (Dr. Kibenge, Dr. Nylund, Ms. Gagné, and Dr. Miller) that, as of December 2011, there was no evidence that fish tested for ISAv (the virus) suffered from ISA (the disease) as that disease was then understood.” – Justice Bruce Cohen; Volume 2, Chapter 2, Decline-Related Evidence, page 60.
I am not sure if samples from Chile were ever sent to the OIE reference lab in Norway; however, it should be noted that ISA was first described in Norway in 1984 and that country is probably one of the leading places in the world in research into ISA. A total of 438 outbreaks have been reported in Norway during the time period from 1984 to 2005 (Lyngstad et al 2007), so I would find it hard to believe that this particular area of the globe is resistant to finding ISA or cannot find it. If these Norwegian scientists were trying to protect the Norwegian government from embarrassing ISA results then I highly doubt they would be diligent enough to monitor and document ISA occurrences in Norwegian fish farms and post them on their website for the public to see. Do not take my word for it – go to the Norwegian Veterinary Institute website and see what they are doing. The reports are right there for anyone to read. Lastly, DFO biologists have already detected ISAV in amongst wild and farmed Atlantic Salmon populations in New Brunswick (can be found in the puresalmon.org website you posted).
http://www.vetinst.no/eng/Publications/Report-Series