I read that particular article from the Tyee before. Although we do not know the whole story yet from the OIE, I do not believe Ms Morton’s version of events in the Tyee article. For one thing her version does not jive with what the Dean of the AVC and Dr. Evans appear to be saying. More importantly, even if the CFIA asked the OIE to strip AVC lab of its reference designation it is up to the OIE to make that determination whether to strip a laboratory of its OIE reference designation and decide whether things have been straighten out enough for reinstatement – not the CFIA. Morton is just trying to do her best to deflect attention away from this audit and focus it back on the CFIA. I can see why Morton is focusing her assault on the CFIA because it is a easy target for her after the inquiry and it is a easy rallying cry for her supporters; however, she might want to start asking the OIE some questions seeing as though they are the ones that determine whether the AVC lab is an OIE ISA reference lab or not. Even if BC is designated ISAV positive there is still much about these sequences being found that are a mystery. If you read Vol. 2 of the Cohen Report (Summary of Decline-Related Evidence and Findings) Cohen discusses how the panel of experts on this topic could not come to an agreement on whether ISAV or an ISAV –like virus is present in wild salmon here.