For example, the piscine reovirus, which attacks the fish's heart muscle is coming up positive in most of the samples from the farm fish from supermarkets.
I understand that AM will try to keep it simple here but it is important to understand the difference between having disease and having a virus. While it has been claimed that farmed salmon are showing signs of disease from PRV it simply may not be the case. The same goes for ISA. For example, I could have a common flue and exhibit symptoms associated with SARS, or mad cow, or even a cold. It does not mean that I have SARS or bird flue. I feel that while PRV is in our environment now AM has chosen to mislead the public by confusing the virus with the disease buy stating fish are showing signs of disease when in fact these symptoms of disease are common with other health issues. It seams to be that AM is blaming the salmon farms for the presence of PRV and ISA, that simply is not a proven fact. There are other possibility's. At this stage it really does not matter but I think the source should be looked into.
Sportfishermen in Norway don't think a salmon can make it up a river with this virus.
Biologically speaking comparing atlantics to pacific s is not very reliable. If atlantics had ISA here as it has been suggested likely for 25 or more years, why has there not been a large atlatic die off in bc since they started farming them here?
Guys on the salmon feedlots have told me the fish are dying of heart failure as they are seined.
Sound like an interesting harvest crew. I wish that in my harvest days I had a chance to stop and cut some fish for a peek inside and take some samples for the lab. It would have been a nice break from working my butt off, he he. So you are suspecting that the fish are dying from HSMI via PVR from being in a seine net based on what the harvester told you?
BC wild salmon are facing a whole new world and it is not good.
BC Salmon are facing a whole new world and have been for some time. Not just the last 30 years. More like the last 100 years and it is not good. This ISA thing is known to have been around for some time already. Is there any evidence of how long PRV has been here?
Your presentation that the salmon farms are disease infested mutation grounds fails to recognize that many MANY viruses are present in the wild with or without salmon farms. This abides to your "natural order" rule. It is natural to have an abundance of viruses in the wild. It just is the way it is. By your interpretation, pristine and natural would be a bottle of distilled water.
I am curious if the farm farmers on this site know what diseases their fish have, or are they kept in the dark on this.
I find it interesting how the anti's are always so keen on suggesting ownership of those who work on salmon farms. Perhaps if I was a janitor in a lab I would have better exposure to fish health data but anyone can get it via FOIA.
I hope we agree that much more research is due to better understand the issues around bc salmon. There are some awesome studies already underway that I anxiously await the results.
Many of your supporters always state that removing salmon farms is not the smoking gun but it is the one thing that we can actually control. The only other thing I can think of is to stop fishing the heck out of them. Yourself as a self appointed advocate for wild salmon would agree with this but you never mention it. Why not? If the salmon farms did go who or what would be you next target group to further your preferred natural order? There are so many to chose from I am curious which group you would pick. Would it be the alaska sea ranching, or our local user groups(natives, commies, sporties) that as individuals take little bits but together add up to alot. I suppose you could go after the Fraser and its tributarys and resume natural order there in order to help lower the water temps there.
Thanks for your time on this.