http://www.biomedcentral.com/content/pdf/1471-2164-15-200.pdf
Great post Bob! I especially liked this ...
"The present work shows that when co-habited and subjected
to identical copepodid exposures, chum salmon
become infected with higher densities (lice per host
weight (g)) of salmon lice Lepeophtheirus salmonis than
do Atlantic or pink salmon. The higher infection density
on chum compared to pink salmon was previously identified
[22] and the inclusion of Atlantic salmon here provides
more information on the susceptibility spectrum of
Pacific and Atlantic salmon. We conclude that juvenile
pink salmon are resistant whereas juvenile Atlantic and
particularly chum salmon are susceptible."
Kinda downplays Almo's theory of pink salmon extirpation from sea lice and shows there are many more factors involved in salmonid population fluctuations, salmon farming being at the bottom of that list.
So, will Almo now start blaming low chum numbers (are they low?) on sea lice? Stay tuned, she has a few years left to stir the pot and request your money