More fake news exposed.
http://www.alaskasalmonranching.com/searching-for-anvesha-sharma/
Interesting how this "nutritionist" packed up and left when questioned. I mean if it was truly legit they would stick around and respond. The internet can be a great source of information but it's "buyer beware" with many sites.
Well the 2004 Hites study had numerous critics and was kind misleading in many respects. To alarm people away from farmed salmon because of undocumented, long term risk of cancer versus the more immediate threat of heart disease and other obesity related diseases makes no sense to me. I mean we could use the EPA guidelines and be really strict, but is that going to be better for society as a whole or would it be better to encourage people to eat farmed or wild salmon to tackle the immediate health threats?
There are many things we consume that are potentially harmful to us, but some we would have to consume great quantities in such a short time in order to harm us. We would likely vomit first before we suffered long term impacts. I remember folks here in BC being so paranoid about Fukushima impacts, but the amount of radiation they were taking about that was here as a result of the disaster was less than what we are typically exposed to each day. Actually operating a microwave oven was worse I believe. I concede that pregnant woman are going to opt for as little risk as possible, not matter how slight it is. I don't blame them because they are flooded with information on what to do and what not to do and meanwhile baby is coming out in 9 months. As I have said from the beginning, I'm going to encourage my children to eat a balanced diet which can include farmed or wild salmon because it would be a greater risk not to. Personally, I feed them trout I catch because it's something I like to do and encourage them to one day do also for their own kids.