Yes all sides in many arguments seem to state it wrong when it suits their argument. Were record runs concurrent with high concentrations of salmon farms and maybe even lice? Prove it! I debunked the claim that a record run of pinks returned to the Broughton Archipelago immediately after the infamous collapse. Was there a good return? It was nowhere near a record. Likewise we continue to see good returns in some years despite the historically high numbers of pinnipeds in the SOG. So much for relationships claimed and supported by correlation.
Simple fact is there is more to the variability of salmon returns than a single factor or 2. Get use to it, there is not a single silver bullet or 2 that is going to return us to the ocean survival levels of the 1980s.
But while we are at it how about some hard data on the removal of fish farms might do:
"In response to a federal government order, the number of salmon farms operating in the Discovery Islands region declined from eight in 2020, to one in 2022. Over this period, 1627 juvenile pink (Oncorhynchus gorbuscha) and chum (Oncorhynchus keta) salmon captured at sites throughout the study area were examined for sea lice. T
he average number of sea lice per juvenile salmon declined by 96% over the study period. Such a substantial decline was not witnessed in similar samples from the nearby Broughton Archipelago. The decline could not be attributed to chance sampling, and only a small proportion of it was associated with environmental fluctuations."
source: Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences. Effect of government removal of salmon farms on sea lice infection of juvenile wild salmon in the Discovery Islands; V80 #12
https://cdnsciencepub.com/doi/full/10.1139/cjfas-2023-0039?fbclid=IwY2xjawGjAZ1leHRuA2FlbQIxMAABHaT7UamqdAjD3mSVtn7-j-c-txfDh__7rjohVe3G2DhRJYj9j1gre-Pyug_aem_IMBIJQ-lXuLlK_qZ_KrebQ