Fishing with Rod Discussion Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

Author Topic: Aquaculture  (Read 84693 times)

chris gadsden

  • Old Timer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 13952
Re: Aquaculture
« Reply #120 on: June 22, 2013, 10:28:15 PM »

Here's the translation--will be cut into parts:(Northern Lights) clockwise around 0730. He stood up, checked e-mail. A new message caught his attention: A picture of today's front page of VG. The title "Doctors and professors of farmed fish: Do not give salmon to the children." One of the titles saying, 'May cause brain damage. "

Christian Chramer, communications director of the Norwegian Seafood Council in Tromso, did not have to fight to rub the sleep out of his eyes. He was wide awake.

SERVICES

Super card you must obtain
Near the worst scenario
- Such a front page in the country's most read newspaper, with such a title and image, is close to the worst case. Hugging the worst scenario. Early on a Monday morning. We had not received any notice that such a thing could be, he says to Nordlys.

- The only thing that could have been worse, was that there was truth in the allegations.

Out of War
The seven that make up the communications staff in seafood council knew what would be their job this Monday, the 10th June and the following days. They had to go to war. In the fight to protect the reputation of the gold in the Norwegian fish exports. Farmed salmon.

Last year, exports of Norwegian salmon unimaginable 29 billion. Domestic consumption in Norway is also very large. Norwegians are world champions in eating salmon. High values are at stake when such serious allegations arise.

SALMONIDS PREPAREDNESS: They have been on Alert salmon under debate in recent days, communication advisors Geir Bakkevoll and Lars Fredrik Martinussen and colleagues at the Norwegian Seafood Council in Tromsø. Photo: Thorgrim Rath Olsen
Geir Bakkevoll, Communications and the Christian Chramer weapons girders in seafood council learned of it already at 0615 this morning. He received an sms from a friend with the following message, read VG.

The contingency plan
Then it snowballed. 0730 was the communications department in Seafood Council notified. At 0800 the rest of the organization. 0900 is the first mediehenvendelsen, from the media industry in the seafood industry, login.

Half an hour later met communications department, two from the management team and responsible for the Norwegian seafood market to meet in the meeting room shanties, the Seafood Council headquarters Strandveien in Tromsø.

They took out the emergency plan. Issues Management Plan. Communications Staff's battle plan for dealing with such situations. Handling negative media coverage, which may have the potential to damage the reputation of Norwegian salmon in Norway or in the major international markets. Bad news tends to spread rapidly as viruses, across borders. Out in the vast international market

chris gadsden

  • Old Timer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 13952
Re: Aquaculture
« Reply #121 on: June 22, 2013, 10:33:33 PM »

EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS PLAN: Communication staff in seafood council has a contingency plan to deal with possible reputation threats. Photo: Thorgrim Rath Olsen
Protecting
- Here you must think in seafood communications mitigation?

- We invest the hundreds of millions per year in building brand Norwegian seafood both in Norway and abroad. We perceive it as natural task to protect and enhance the brand.

- We do this with the thought that people should be confident that Norwegian seafood is wholesome and good. Our job is not to define what is healthy, but to ensure that the facts and information coming out of both consumers and importers of Norwegian seafood, says communications director Chramer.

Warned
The substance in VG lookup in print and online were health experts warned against contaminants in farmed salmon. The main source was the Norwegian doctor Anne-Lise Birch Monsen in Bergen, referring to the so-called persistent organic pollutants found in salmon feed, which among other things can have a negative effect on brain development.

"I do not recommend pregnant women, children or young people eating farmed salmon. It is uncertain in both the amount of toxins salmon contains and how these drugs affect children, adolescents and pregnant, "the doctor said to the newspaper.

Norwegian News Agency brought the case on the country. Online Media threw themselves on. A debate about farmed salmon and pollutant grew in strength.

Not intimidated
- This I do not believe anything. That was my first thought about the allegations. I did not believe it had come completely new facts during the weekend, which means that you suddenly can discourage children to eat salmon, says Chramer.

He did not believe that some doctors with one punch could change the established official dietary advice from the Norwegian health authorities, that we should eat fish for dinner at least two to three times a week.

His colleague in the communications staff, Communications Lars Fredrik Martinussen, was not intimidated.

- It is that we are safe on the Norwegian matovervåkningssystemet, the Norwegian research and the current dietary guidelines. All safety because we internally communications department has practiced such situations.

Lion each year
They are trimmed to meet such situations, communications staff at the Norwegian Seafood Council, south of Tromsø.

- The requirement of alertness and quick reaction to negative media coverage in the various markets has increased. We spend more resources on such emergency today than when I started in 2007. At that time we were two staff on communications, today we have seven, says Christian Chramer.

Little drama
How would they handle the media debate about contaminants in farmed Norwegian salmon, which began with a posting in VG Monday 10 June? It was the main theme as the staff sat around the table in the meeting room at Rorbua. 0930 this Monday.

- But the atmosphere was a little dramatic, little tense. The case was based, clearly the tasks, according Chramer.

chris gadsden

  • Old Timer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 13952
Re: Aquaculture
« Reply #122 on: June 22, 2013, 10:34:56 PM »

SALMONIDS DEFENSE: Despite regular news about salmon escapes, sea lice, toxins, the Norwegian farmed salmon good reputation in the Norwegian and international market, according seafood Council. The value of salmon exports and domestic sales in Norway are increasing. Photo: Terje Marøy
- Yes, you should see us stressed, you need to see us during the annual exercises, says communications Lars Fredrik Martinussen.

Well prepared
They practice annually on crisis management, with scenarios such as oil spills or radioactive emissions that could potentially threaten the Norwegian seafood's reputation.

- We see the value of being well prepared. This is probably something I have with me from my military background, having good, realistic exercises. That means that when something happens, you can not react with paralysis or panic, says Chramer, who has worked as Chief of the Army.

At the 0930 meeting this Monday was the description of the situation. What were the allegations and facts in VG's coverage of the dangerous farmed salmon? Responsibilities were divided: Responsibility for monitoring the media debate, keep in touch with the media. Keeping contact with the authorities and agencies that have expertise in food research and food safety, as Food Safety Authority and the National Institute of Nutrition and Seafood Research (NIFES). Contact the seafood industry. Contact the organization, particularly with Seafood Council's 12 field offices.

All responsibility for monitoring and engagement on social media.

- We run many websites, plus many channels of social media, both in Norway and abroad. We have 81 000 followers on our Facebook Page Norwegian, for example. We selected during the morning to go out with a fairly aggressive strategy to communicate via social media.

Long days
The debate about farmed salmon has affected their everyday work throughout the past week. Long days from 0800 am until 0100-0200 at night for some. Several media have brought new issues to the table on salmon and food security. New voices have come in and nuanced picture of the dangerous salmon.

Norwegian debate and what happens on the Norwegian market is important, even for a typical export-oriented seafood industry. Very important. Communications Director Christian Chramer explains why:

Bad news spreads quickly
- Norway is a large market with high consumption of seafood. It is the home base for the formation of opinion. Bad news in Norway is spreading quickly to other markets, and often with new questions and approaches.

- When should one time been at the forefront. Have translated facts from such FSA, to English, Spanish, French or German.

Communications Director Christian Chramer says that different markets, different countries may have their particular issues related to food security.

- Some countries have had other food-related issues over the years. In Italy scandals around mozzarella cheese, the China scandals surrounding additives in milk replacer, horse meat scandal in Europe. We must be prepared.

- Have the salmon case attracted attention abroad so far?

- No. It has been mentioned by TT, which is Sweden's answer to the NTB, and in Svenska Dagbladet. But beyond that, very little.

Refines advice
Chramer think salmon debate is starting to slow. Still, the Norwegian health authorities that salmon is healthy and that we should eat more of it. Directorate of Health has announced a clarification of dietary advice when it comes to fatty fish, like salmon, to young women and pregnant women. The Council is a maximum of two fatty fish meals a week to those groups.

- Crisis management has been successful?

- It must be second rate. The final verdict comes from consumers, in terms of trust and willingness to buy salmon.

The salmon is popular
- Nourishes can any fear of the salmon hits a snag in the Norwegian market as a result of this?

- No, I do not. The warning from the authorities is still very clear: we should eat more fish. At the same time the salmon very strong in Norway. It is very popular in all groups, from young families to senior centers. The reports we have received from the retail sector indicate that it is quiet.

- But you can not avoid that there are some contaminants in farmed salmon?

- I do not agree that there is a lot of contaminants in salmon. Salmon is a healthy product. It is also a fact that we humans over the past century has been able to produce toxins that come to us through many different foods, including seafood. But the National Institute of Nutrition and Seafood Research, nifes, said in a message this week that contaminants have decreased in salmon. Not up, one could get the impression by media stories over the past week.

The storm subsides
Today, a week after the alarm went off the Norwegian Seafood Council, the communications director Christian Chramer assured that the storm is about to subside.

- Salmon has become part of everyday habits of most Norwegians. Allegations from a doctor or chef cooking for those who can afford to pay 2500 dollars for a meal, does not change the national character. Or by products that have entered the everyday diet.

Believe Chramer, which has lowered guarden anything. For right now he guides reporters from Singapore on the press trip in farming Norway. The Norwegian media debate about pollutants in salmon is probably not on the day's schedule.

alwaysfishn

  • Old Timer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2364
Re: Aquaculture
« Reply #123 on: June 23, 2013, 09:03:41 AM »

The feedlots are developing quite a reputation for killing things.....   reminds you of the tobacco companies.
Logged
Disclosure:  This post has not been approved by the feedlot boys, therefore will likely be found to contain errors and statements that are out of context. :-[

chris gadsden

  • Old Timer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 13952

chris gadsden

  • Old Timer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 13952
Re: Aquaculture
« Reply #126 on: June 29, 2013, 05:14:13 PM »

alwaysfishn

  • Old Timer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2364
Logged
Disclosure:  This post has not been approved by the feedlot boys, therefore will likely be found to contain errors and statements that are out of context. :-[

chris gadsden

  • Old Timer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 13952
Re: Aquaculture
« Reply #128 on: June 29, 2013, 10:23:16 PM »

Great article Chris!
Yes and some think Alex was the only one concerned about FF fish and her concerns were unfounded. How will some others respond to this one?

shuswapsteve

  • Old Timer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 894
Re: Aquaculture
« Reply #129 on: June 30, 2013, 12:40:19 AM »

What year was this article posted, Chris?  The reason I ask is because most of what is posted is old news - much of it has been either refuted because it was highly misleading (i.e. Hites et al 2004) or examined more closely which resulted in a little more clearer picture of our current knowledge, impacts and where we need to go (i.e. Cohen recommendations).  Here is an example:

Quote
"The debate is over," said study co-author Alexandra Morton, a biologist with the Raincoast Research Society. "This paper brings our understanding of farm-origin sea lice and Pacific wild salmon to the point where we know there is a clear severe impact."

Well, actually it wasn't when this 2006 study came out.  For example, Cohen examined this in more detail.  Strange how Cohen is not even mentioned in the website you posted.

http://www.cohencommission.ca/en/pdf/FinalReport/CohenCommissionFinalReport_Vol02_05.pdf#zoom=100

Even stranger that this was not posted on that website either.  Why are fish farm critics like Ms Morton uncomfortable with this peer-reviewed study?

http://icesjms.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2010/10/09/icesjms.fsq146.abstract

This is actually a balanced, objective study that came out in 2012.  Where is this on that website you provided?

http://people.landfood.ubc.ca/anthony.farrell/pubs/p337_Brauner_et_al_2012.pdf

Recent evidence is pointing to an increase in abundance in Pink salmon in the North Pacific.  Clearly, the interaction between pathogen, fish and environment is not so clear cut as Ms Morton stated above.

http://www.npafc.org/new/pub_technical8.html
« Last Edit: June 30, 2013, 12:44:58 AM by shuswapsteve »
Logged

alwaysfishn

  • Old Timer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2364
Re: Aquaculture
« Reply #130 on: June 30, 2013, 07:46:18 AM »

As usual Stevey, you are so focused on defending the feedlots that you missed the point of the article.

The article has been published by a non-profit foundation that has no commercial interests nor does it accept advertising. It's focused on a healthier environment and healthier foods. http://www.whfoods.com/whoweare.php "The George Mateljan Foundation for the World's Healthiest Foods was established by George Mateljan to discover, develop and share scientifically proven information about the benefits of healthy eating, and to provide the personalized support individuals need to make eating The World's Healthiest Foods enjoyable, easy, quick and affordable."

Feedlot salmon are not healthy for the environment and when compared to wild salmon they are not healthy for humans either.
Logged
Disclosure:  This post has not been approved by the feedlot boys, therefore will likely be found to contain errors and statements that are out of context. :-[

shuswapsteve

  • Old Timer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 894
Re: Aquaculture
« Reply #131 on: June 30, 2013, 09:56:16 PM »

As usual Stevey, you are so focused on defending the feedlots that you missed the point of the article.

The article has been published by a non-profit foundation that has no commercial interests nor does it accept advertising. It's focused on a healthier environment and healthier foods. http://www.whfoods.com/whoweare.php "The George Mateljan Foundation for the World's Healthiest Foods was established by George Mateljan to discover, develop and share scientifically proven information about the benefits of healthy eating, and to provide the personalized support individuals need to make eating The World's Healthiest Foods enjoyable, easy, quick and affordable."

Feedlot salmon are not healthy for the environment and when compared to wild salmon they are not healthy for humans either.

Of course you would take it as defending fish farms because like the Omega issue on this forum you can't see the forest through the trees.  Actually, I think you missed most of the article.....and of course failed to read the research since the 2006 sea lice study.  I picked out one example of this "scientifically proven information" in my previous post.  From the information I provided it is pretty clear that way pathogens (in this case sea lice) interact with their host did not end with the Krkosek et al 2006 study.  Even Morton et al 2011 seemed to agree,.....but farm critics would rather just sweep that study under the carpet because it doesn't align with the message. 
Logged

alwaysfishn

  • Old Timer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2364
Re: Aquaculture
« Reply #132 on: July 01, 2013, 08:23:34 AM »

http://commonground.ca/2013/07/wild-salmon-warrior-news-2/

" I do not recommend pregnant women, children or young people to eat farmed salmon.
–Norwegian doctor Anne-Lise Birch Monsen"
Logged
Disclosure:  This post has not been approved by the feedlot boys, therefore will likely be found to contain errors and statements that are out of context. :-[

shuswapsteve

  • Old Timer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 894
Re: Aquaculture
« Reply #133 on: July 01, 2013, 09:45:32 PM »

http://www.heart.org/HEARTORG/General/Frequently-Asked-Questions-About-Fish_UCM_306451_Article.jsp

Q: Are there differences in Omega-3 fatty acid content between wild fish and farmed fish?

A: Some farmed fish can have higher levels of omega-3 fatty acid than wild fish, and vice versa. 

The omega-3 fatty acid content of wild fish can vary by the temperature of their environment (i.e., higher during the summer than winter), while the omega-3 fatty acid content of farmed fish can vary based on what they are fed. 

The American Heart Association recommends eating fish at least twice a week, especially species high in omega-3 fatty acid such as salmon, mackerel, herring and trout, regardless of whether they are wild or farmed.


Q: If I eat fish at least twice a week, should I worry about contamination?

A: For middle-aged men and for post-menopausal women, the benefits of eating fish a few times per week far outweigh the potential risks. 

As fish consumption increases, the number of fatal cardiovascular events decreases and the cardiovascular benefit increases.  Research has shown that omega-3 fatty acids may help decrease the risk of arrhythmias (irregular heartbeats) and may help slow the growth rate of artery-clogging plaque.  Scientific evidence shows that eating fish is associated with reduced cardiovascular risks and increased health.  Based on these benefits, and the fact that most people do not eat recommended amounts of fish, it seems reasonable to recommend that people eat more fish. 

For women who are or may become pregnant, nursing mothers and young children, the benefits of eating fish twice per week are also greater than the potential risks.  However, four specific fish species (shark, swordfish, king mackerel and tilefish) should be avoided to minimize exposure to mercury.  In addition, albacore tuna can be eaten but should be limited to six ounces (one average meal) per week.  See the EPA and FDA advisory for up-to-date detailed information. 

The potential risks from other contaminants (such as PCBs or dioxins, which are also found in trace amounts in many foods) are exceedingly small relative to the benefits of eating fish, so you don’t need to be concerned about eating fish because of this potential issue.  (If you eat a lot of sports-caught freshwater fish from local waters, check your local advisories.)  Consumers should remove the skin and surface fat before cooking to reduce the risk of eating contaminants.


The public is at greater risk of cardiovascular diseases than any illness related to eating farmed or wild salmon.  I guess this means that the American Heart Association has joined the OIE in this big conspiracy now...lol.
Logged

alwaysfishn

  • Old Timer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2364
Re: Aquaculture
« Reply #134 on: July 01, 2013, 10:12:29 PM »

You gotta like how they avoid the question of contaminants.....

Coles notes answer: "We know the contaminants are bad for you but please be advised that the Omega-3 is good for you...." 

http://www.sciencemag.org/content/303/5655/226.short
".........  Having analyzed over 2 metric tons of farmed and wild salmon from around the world for organochlorine contaminants, we show that concentrations of these contaminants are significantly higher in farmed salmon than in wild. European-raised salmon have significantly greater contaminant loads than those raised in North and South America, indicating the need for further investigation into the sources of contamination. Risk analysis indicates that consumption of farmed Atlantic salmon may pose health risks that detract from the beneficial effects of fish consumption."

Smart folks will avoid the contaminated feedlot stuff and find an alternate source for their Omega 3.
Logged
Disclosure:  This post has not been approved by the feedlot boys, therefore will likely be found to contain errors and statements that are out of context. :-[