The difference between the Chile situation and here is that in 2007, when Chile had a rapidly progressing disease outbreak that was killing many farmed fish in the pens, Kibenge was able to identify it and the identification was confirmed by both multiple tests and deteriorating conditions on the farms.
Here, prior to 2011 and Kibenge's testing, there was no disease outbreak. In 2011, subsequent to Kibenge claiming positive results, there was no disease outbreak and in 2013, there still is no disease outbreak. The fish health monitoring program has tested for ISA for many years and has found no sign of it. Subsequent testing of farmed and wild stocks for signs of the virus has turned up no sign of it and testing for it in Washington has turned up no sign of it.
When Kibenge identified it here even though no-one else was or has been able to confirm it, his lab protocols were audited not once, but twice to confirm the accuracy of his implementation of the required testing protocols, an obvious response given the situation. In both audits, his implementations of the required protocols were found to be inadequate with the potential to lead to false results.
After the first audit, rather than tighten up on his compliance with the required protocols in order to meet the specified standards required of an OIE certified lab, Kibenge claimed harassment and didn't improve his compliance with the requirements. As a consequence, after failing the second audit to measure his improvement in compliance with the required OIE protocols his certification was stripped, once again, an obvious response due to the critical and in Kibenge's case, unfulfilled, need for accuracy and reliability in testing.