Fishing with Rod Discussion Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

Author Topic: Alaskan fisheries endangering B.C.'s Skeena sockeye salmon  (Read 4286 times)

troutbreath

  • Old Timer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2908
  • I does Christy
Alaskan fisheries endangering B.C.'s Skeena sockeye salmon
« on: July 17, 2013, 05:49:17 PM »

Alaskan fisheries endangering B.C.'s Skeena sockeye salmon: conservationists
  By KIM NURSALL, Canadian PressJuly 17, 2013 5:19 PM
 
 A sockeye salmon is reeled in by a fisherman along the shores of the Fraser River near Chilliwack, B.C., Wednesday, Sept. 1, 2010. Critics are blaming the federal government for the poor return of sockeye salmon to the Fraser River in 2009. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Jonathan HaywardA near record-low sockeye salmon run for Skeena River fisheries has cut off the catch in B.C., but conservation groups say Alaskan fishermen are not pulling in their nets, making the problem worse.

"This is probably one of the lowest (runs) we've seen in about 50 years," said Mel Kotyk, North Coast area director for the Department of Fisheries and Oceans.

Only 453,000 sockeye are expected to swim up the Skeena this year, Kotyk said, compared to approximately 2.4 million last year. The DFO has been forced to close all commercial and recreational fisheries for the area.

Speculation over the cause of the collapse continues, but Watershed Watch conservationist Aaron Hill is worried that Alaskan fisheries are causing even greater harm.

"The Alaskan commercial fisheries are still going right across the border and hammering these fish," he said in an interview on Wednesday. "We need to get as many of these fish back onto the spawning grounds as possible to ensure that this collapse isn't perpetuated in future years."

Hill and other conservationists are calling on the federal government to defend Canada's interests by asking Alaskans to move their fisheries to avoid accidentally catching sockeye.

"It's important that everybody shares the burden of conservation and it doesn't just fall on Canadian fishermen," Hill said. "This is definitely a matter of Canadian public interest in an international jurisdiction, and we're just not happy with the level of attention that it's getting from our federal government."

B.C. conservationists are targeting Alaskan pink and chum salmon fisheries who catch a significant number of sockeye as a by-product of their operations.

Hill said that if those fisheries moved closer to the rivers where pink and chum spawn, the sockeye could make it back to the Skeena.

"They just need to shift their fishing effort to a different location where they're not going to be catching so many of these fish," he said. "They could still target the abundant local stocks."

DFO spokesman Kotyk said that the government has been providing regular updates to Alaskan fishery managers for the sockeye run.

"They're very aware of the conditions, and so they would factor that into any of (their) decisions," he said. "From my understanding they have taken steps, but I cannot elaborate."

Kotyk added that the Canadian and Alaskan state governments meet at the end of each year and discuss what impacts they had on each other's fish.

"That would be the discussion point as to what we could have done differently," he said.

The Alaska Department of Fish and Game said it would respond to a request for comment, but did not get back to The Canadian Press in time for publication.

Under the Canada-U.S. Pacific Salmon Treaty, Alaskans are allowed to catch Skeena-bound sockeye salmon. The Skeena sockeye salmon run is the second largest in B.C. after the Fraser River, and the amount of salmon caught by Alaskan fisheries has been a concern for a number of years.

A 2008 report by the Skeena Independent Science Panel to the provincial and federal governments estimated that Alaskans catch approximately 23 per cent of all the sockeye harvested from the run.

The high percentage makes it difficult for Canadians to catch sockeye sustainably, the report said. As a result, the government "should utilize all available mechanisms to ensure that Alaskan harvests of Skeena salmon . . . are reduced."

The forecast for this year's Skeena sockeye run is so low that Kotyk said the government has begun consultations with First Nations groups to see if they can reduce their food, social and ceremonial fishing.

"Low sockeye return is of great concern to First Nations people on the Skeena," the chair of the First Nations' Skeena Fisheries Commission, Stu Barnes, said in an email.

"All we can do is provide technical advice to our member Nations," said Barnes. "It's up (to) individual First Nations to take the advice and act as they see fit."

© Copyright (c) The Vancouver Sun
   A sockeye salmon is reeled in by a fisherman along the shores of the Fraser River near Chilliwack, B.C., Wednesday, Sept. 1, 2010. Critics are blaming the federal government for the poor return of sockeye salmon to the Fraser River in 2009. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Jonathan Hayward 
Logged
another SLICE of dirty fish perhaps?

liketofish

  • Old Timer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 702
Re: Alaskan fisheries endangering B.C.'s Skeena sockeye salmon
« Reply #1 on: July 19, 2013, 12:07:49 AM »

Looks like the Fraser sockeye run may be the same fate if ocean survival is the issue with the Skeener fish. Oh well, there is always the pinks this year.  ;)
Logged

Bassonator

  • Old Timer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 659
Re: Alaskan fisheries endangering B.C.'s Skeena sockeye salmon
« Reply #2 on: July 19, 2013, 10:10:04 AM »

Looks like the Fraser sockeye run may be the same fate if ocean survival is the issue with the Skeener fish. Oh well, there is always the pinks this year.  ;)

Like Ive said before let the commercial and sport fishers do what the feedlots arent..... :'(
Logged
Take the T out of Morton.

shuswapsteve

  • Old Timer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 894
Re: Alaskan fisheries endangering B.C.'s Skeena sockeye salmon
« Reply #3 on: July 19, 2013, 05:13:18 PM »

Looks like the Fraser sockeye run may be the same fate if ocean survival is the issue with the Skeener fish. Oh well, there is always the pinks this year.  ;)

A little bit too early to tell on that one.  Need to keep looking at the test fisheries such as those in Area 20.  So far according to Mission, Early Stuarts are coming through Hells Gate steadily and conditions through that area are close to average which is a good sign.  In the last few years, water conditions (especially discharge) during this time along the Fraser were far above average, so hopefully they are getting a break this year.  However, the Fraser Panel increased the management adjustment factor for Early Stuarts.  What this factor attempts to do is allow more fish to escape to meet escapement targets because of possible discrepancies between Mission and the terminal areas as well as possible enroute loss.  Hopefully, conditions on the spawning grounds in the Takla Lake area are favourable enough.

http://www.psc.org/news_frpnews.htm   
Logged

Fisherbob

  • Old Timer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1368
Re: Alaskan fisheries endangering B.C.'s Skeena sockeye salmon
« Reply #4 on: August 09, 2013, 10:04:11 AM »

Thank you TB. This has been happening for too long.
Logged

notracy

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 35
Re: Alaskan fisheries endangering B.C.'s Skeena sockeye salmon
« Reply #5 on: August 10, 2013, 06:02:06 PM »

In my little knowledge of some of the efforts of the DFO, it is my understanding that the BC Government and the US state of Washington have been working together over the last few years to help re-boost the sockeye and all other salmon species. Does anyone know if the BC and alaskan governments are working together or not?
Logged