so whats the answer, regs in different languages or a test that everyone has to pass to get their licence. i am in favor of the test option.
I dont think either is going to fix the problem. If they are not using legal fishing methods, I doubt they care that much about having a license either.
Having the regs in different languages would be helpful though, make it more accessible to those who want to fish properly but can't read good english. If "No English" is a truthful response from these guys, then maybe, just maybe, they actually DO care about fishing but this language thing is a barrier for them...
Of course, I dont think there are THAT many people who dont have a close relative who DOES speak fluent english (a son or daughter for instance, maybe a brother or sister or cousin) who COULD read the regs for them and explain what they can/can't do while fishing, and this is the reason I dont think having the regs in other languages will help enough. Its not like English is an entirely inaccessible language, there is tonnes of ESL services and stuff around. Hell, you could probably walk into a chinese church and ask the minister to translate the regs if you can't speak English.
A test isn't a bad idea though. To be allowed to hunt, you need to pass a test. You can either take the course, or just buy the book and challenge the test. Something similar would be a good idea. Make it something you only have to write once in your life. The problem here is cost - it can't be a free test, because someone would have to administer it, and nobody works for free these days... And why the hell should I have to go pay for a test when I already know wtf Im doing, meanwhile lots of the people who dont know wtf they are doing will just skip the test and go fish illegally.