its not like im being stubborn , I just want to understand why someone with gear can do it , and someone with other gear cant .... with using the same amount of water ... maybe even less in my case
So this thread went sideways a while ago, until this? Why is it acceptable for one form of fishing to take up an entire run, when another equally productive style is frowned upon? Both are perfectly legal, in no way inherently interfere with another persons enjoyment, but the one that is probably less intrusive in cramped quarters is actually considered bad form?
The answer I will likely receive is ethics, but who decided that this was the ethics we had to follow? Who defines what is acceptable? The river has changed, the sport has changed. What was true 50 years ago is not true today. This is not a rhetorical question. I am actually curios, if people fish for fun, and a person is not breaking any laws or interfering with anyone else' enjoyment more than another why is it wrong?
EDIT: In response to sandman's post. Your claim that know one would complain about him using a sturgeon rod is negated by Milo's earlier post about filming it and calling it "Beek of the Week" and Rodney's alluded to reference of the same thing.