similar evidence has been provided as proof on this website in the last few weeks...FNs are killing all the Fraser chum and the IFS to boot but no complaints on that!
Exactly what is the science and how is it used on the internet specifically on this site?
BTW Morton's claims at the time were largely supported by a group of scientists who reported direct to the then Minister of Fisheries. They were not satisfied by the scientific methodology used by DFO to disprove her claims.
Some might be interested to search for the Pacific Fisheries Resource Conservation Council Report of Nov 2002 titled
2002 ADVISORY: THE PROTECTION OF
BROUGHTON ARCHIPELAGO PINK
SALMON STOCKS
A quote from the cover letter:
While scientific certainty is not absolute, European research does indicate that sea lice abundance can be associated with salmon farming. Given this evidence, combined with the presence of sea lice on Broughton Archipelago pink salmon smolts, and the fact the
decline in numbers was limited to Broughton Archipelago fish, the Council believes that sea lice were associated with the decline observed in the Broughton Archipelago. Where there is a risk of serious or irreversible harm the precautionary approach calls for action
based on the best evidence available. In this Broughton Archipelago case, the absence of any evidence of some other cause, than sea lice, justifies action.