It's like the person who is unfaithful to their spouse and says "I had an affair". Isn't that a nice politically correct way to explain what they did. What they really did is commit 'adultery', but when was the last time you heard someone say "I committed adultery"? Probably never. Society has softened the terms/words of the evil they do to make it more palatable for the masses.
When people start calling out evil with the correct words/terms, then.....maybe the people doing that evil will stop being so calloused to it.
Funny post.
You preach that we should be calling a spade a spade, yet at the same time you state that every affair is adultery and label cheating in a fishing derby and having an affair as "evil" acts.
That's where your post loses all validity.
FYI, having an affair in NOT the same as committing adultery and is seldom used as an argument in divorce proceedings.
As a matter of fact, if you cheat on your wife you are indeed "having an affair", not committing adultery. It only becomes adultery if your spouse hires a lawyer to divorce you on the grounds of your infidelity. So of course nobody "commits adultery". Having an affair can entail much more than having sex with people outside your marriage. There are platonic, non sexual affairs that even legally cannot qualify as adultery, as much as some lawyers and angry partners would like them to.
So yes, I think it is actually quite important to call things out for what they really are and not dump everything in the same basket like you do.
But there are differences (sometimes large, sometime just nuances) that help us distinguish between the ugly and the evil. Failing to take those differences into account would make us no better than some rabid medieval inquisition court.
A misguided young man cheating his way into winning a fishing derby might be wrong, childish, stupid, disappointing, even ugly, but "evil" it is not.
If you think it is, you really have no clue what "evil" really means.