I wonder if FFSBC is providing enough service and program in Region 2 which means the Lower Mainland and Fraser Valley given the number of licensed anglers who live here. Specifically I mean do they stock enough fish, fund habitat improvements and improve access to fishing opportunities (such as providing fishing docks, boat access and improving trail access
where appropriate).It's hard to gauge what they do by region but I have had a look at their latest Annual Report for the year ended March 31, 2023 and for me, it raised some questions.
First per the report the goal of the FFSBC is :
to make fishing in B.C. even better through the enhancement and conservation of B.C.’s freshwater fish resources.The major measurable management achievements they offer is the number of fish stocked and there are some major troubling regional discrepancies.
The annual report states that about 1/3 of licenses are purchased by anglers who reside in Region 2. Further the population of Region 2 is close to 50% of the Provincial total.
Yet the stocking reported by FFSBC in Region 2 is at 387,586, among lowest by Region in the reporting year and comprised only 7% of the Provincial total. Included in that total are 224,162 steelhead smolts from Federal (182,270) and Community hatcheries (41,869). Best I know FFSBC contributes little or no funding to this federal steelhead program and I have no idea if and what they contribute to community steelhead programs.
The two Regions that receive the most stocked fish from FFSBC are Region 5 (Cariboo/Chilcotin) at 2,331,237 and Region 3 (Thomson) at 1,061,842.
I also had a look at past years and checked in detail 1990, a time I recall the fishing locally was much better than today and prior to major cuts in funding over the following 2 decades. Back then Region 2 stocking was close to 870,000. Included in that were over 190,000 cutthroat, 121,400 went into streams. That program has been eliminated while stocking of cutthroat in lakes has been paired down to a few thousand stocked into a few lakes near Pender Harbour.
Now I acknowledge such comparisons may be superficial. Some programs were perhaps found not to work or were not sustainable. Other regions do have more quality lakes etc. There is a goal to enhance tourism plus improve business opportunities in smaller communities. The Federal hatcheries in Region 2 provide enhanced salmon numbers not done in most other regions. That may explain a good part of the discrepancies.
On the other hand, Vancouver Island has received funding to enhance searun cutthroat habitat and for lake fertilization programs.
Back in 1990 more lakes were stocked in Region 2 and with more variety. More rainbow strains were stocked, more lakes were stocked with younger trout that would give them a chance to adapt to a lake environment rather than a hatchery pond before they would be targeted by anglers and so hopefully provide more quality angling. Little of that is done today.
So I'd ask you to think about the points I've made and answer the poll. Provide your own comments and observations. Read those provided by others. I have set the poll up so you can change your vote based on the input of others.
Other resources to have a look at.
The FFSBC Annual Report:
https://ffsbcprod.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/2022-Annual-Report.pdf stocking info is on Page 11
FFSBC website:
https://www.gofishbc.com/BC Fishing Regulations for Region 2 including a map:
https://www2.gov.bc.ca/assets/gov/sports-recreation-arts-and-culture/outdoor-recreation/fishing-and-hunting/freshwater-fishing/region_2_lower_mainland.pdf