If chum numbers don't rebound, the whole eco-system will suffer even more than it does already. Chum are an essential link in the food chain, providing food to numerous animals and nutrients to the river.
Your coho and steelhead can't thrive without chum being part of the equation.
Wanting to see chum numbers "stay near rock bottom" is tantamount to wanting to see the eco-system collapse.
A little dramatic from you, but maybe I'll rephrase what I said a bit.
Instead of having Chum numbers at rock bottom, lets keep them just below the borderline of whether the gillnetters go out or not.
Humans is what needs to be removed from the equation. Too many people in the world with too much money.
You first.
Time to start spay and neutering humans after one child. If your IQ is less than 50 you don't get to procreate at all.
Easy. I got just the tool for that. How long will you wear the cone of shame for?
When do you want to meet up?
There you go, pick apart my writing skills...
It's not your writing skills that concerns me.
To say that chum numbers should stay near rock bottom, I suggest is narrow and self-centric thinking.
To echo Milo, the nutrients that chum salmon deliver from the ocean support so many other species in our west coast ecosystem: bears, eagles, cutthroat trout, the forests, and even the next generation of other salmon.
Bears are doing more than fine. Bears and Eagles will eat whatever they can find. Salmon meat is just the easy answer.
As for cutthroat, I've been fishing them since the early 80s.
We've had many up and down cycles of chum since then. The sea run cutthroat have been on a very steady decline since then.
The good cycles of chum did NOT improve the sea run cutthroat numbers. Unfortunately, the sea run cutthroat fishery is a mere shadow of what it used to be both in size of fish and size of each run. Improving chum numbers won't fix the sea run cutthroat problem.
When chum runs are thriving it means everything else from ocean conditions to coastal forest ecosystems are working as they should. And isn't that more important than catching coho or steelhead?
Lots of decomposing chum is a good thing...I agree.....but it is not a fix all for the things mentioned here.
With that said.....healthy coho and steelhead runs are more important to me. Chum is so gross to the point of inedible. Coho is a wonderful protein.
But I think I get your point. Lots of chum means lots of netting means lots of interception and bycatch of other species. But the chum aren't the problem...
Exactly. Commercial gillnetting the lower Fraser for chum roe is a crime of corporate greed beyond comprehension.