Fishing with Rod Discussion Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

Poll

Which proposed issue is most important to you?

Pacific Fisheries Reform
- 8 (44.4%)
Wild Salmon Policy
- 0 (0%)
Proposed Rockfish Conservation Areas
- 1 (5.6%)
Species at Risk Act additions
- 2 (11.1%)
Freshwater species recovery strategies
- 3 (16.7%)
Sessions are worthwhile
- 2 (11.1%)
Sessions are a waste of time
- 2 (11.1%)

Total Members Voted: 18

Voting closed: September 17, 2005, 08:57:05 AM


Author Topic: DFO embarks on a series of community consultations  (Read 3984 times)

Nostro

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 190
DFO embarks on a series of community consultations
« on: September 14, 2005, 08:57:05 AM »
http://www-comm.pac.dfo-mpo.gc.ca/pages/release/p-releas/2005/nr057_e.htm

Are these "open and inclusive session" worthwhile or a waste of time?
Let's have your votes and opinions.
Thanks
Nostro
Logged
Never look a fish in the eye.

dennisK

  • Old Timer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1396
  • sheep rise up.
Re: DFO embarks on a series of community consultations
« Reply #1 on: September 14, 2005, 09:11:02 AM »
I'd like to know why they need to speed by in their boats 25 ft from the shore where I am casting and create a big stupid wake. (no other boats do that).

Logged

Fish Assassin

  • Old Timer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 10839
Re: DFO embarks on a series of community consultations
« Reply #2 on: September 14, 2005, 10:21:34 AM »
Quote from: dennisK on September 14, 2005, 09:11:02 AM
I'd like to know why they need to speed by in their boats 25 ft from the shore where I am casting and create a big stupid wake. (no other boats do that).



Because they bloody can  :(
Logged

dennisK

  • Old Timer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1396
  • sheep rise up.
Re: DFO embarks on a series of community consultations
« Reply #3 on: September 14, 2005, 10:31:58 AM »
Quote from: Fish Assassin on September 14, 2005, 10:21:34 AM
Quote from: dennisK on September 14, 2005, 09:11:02 AM
I'd like to know why they need to speed by in their boats 25 ft from the shore where I am casting and create a big stupid wake. (no other boats do that).



Because they bloody can  :(

I was fishing with friends who were visiting from Italy and they were surprised by the rude behaviour. Also they asked if flying by fast in a DFO boat and close to shore where people were casting  - would it not scare the fish away?

Just so I do not sound like I am making stuff up. Both incidents occured last sunday afternoon and monday morning on a bar between Hope (near) and Chilliwack - and there were 5 DFO officers in the boat.
Logged

Old Black Dog

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 347
  • I Volunteer!
Re: DFO embarks on a series of community consultations
« Reply #4 on: September 14, 2005, 11:42:50 AM »
It is interesting that so far the votes appear to not care about Wild Salmon Policy and rockfish?

So, I assume that YOU all feel these do not effect your fishing?
Logged

Nikko

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 59
Re: DFO embarks on a series of community consultations
« Reply #5 on: September 14, 2005, 12:03:34 PM »
No, I assume that "Pacific Fisheries Reform" is a large enough topic that it will blanket Wild Salmon and Rockfish topics.

Perhaps that was an incorrect assumption, but why treat the symtpoms when you can go straight to the root of the problem?

Nikko
Logged

blaydRnr

  • Old Timer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1551
  • nothing like the first bite of the season
Re: DFO embarks on a series of community consultations
« Reply #6 on: September 14, 2005, 12:10:43 PM »
Quote from: Old Black Dog on September 14, 2005, 11:42:50 AM
It is interesting that so far the votes appear to not care about Wild Salmon Policy and rockfish?

So, I assume that YOU all feel these do not effect your fishing?

no offense, but at the time you posted this, those two choices were still at '0'.  why didn't you vote for either, or? ???
Logged

Old Black Dog

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 347
  • I Volunteer!
Re: DFO embarks on a series of community consultations
« Reply #7 on: September 14, 2005, 01:09:55 PM »
I voted for sessions are worthwhile!

There was no option to vote for more than one!
Logged

Gooey

  • Old Timer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1618
Re: DFO embarks on a series of community consultations
« Reply #8 on: September 14, 2005, 01:30:31 PM »
My vote for pacific fishery reform is based on my opinion that the FN fishery is out of control right along side the sport sector and their use of flossing.

I think reform on the fraser in terms of FN will greatly impact wild stocks like thompson coho and steelhead not to mention other runs. 

And frankly while I partake in the sockeye flossery (floss + fishery) I am tired of seeing the technique applied outside of sockeye openings for species that will take a presentation of some sort (fraser springs - spin n glo, pinks - flies, spoons, etc etc, ANY Species on the vedder...you get the idea).  I am sick of hearing about the beak snag fest at lickman, peach, KWB, and may other rivers in the lower mainland.  I would like to see a gear restriction of 2-3 foot leaders maybe no bottom bouncing etc.
Logged