The bottom line is, daily quota designation should be decided by the fishery managers. If the harvest opportunities are there, then they should be given. What you and I should be pushing for, is more permanent enforcement officers in our regions to enforce the existing regulations that can make a difference.
Totally agree.
From what I understand from my neighbour (87 years old) In the old days, Greater Vancouver has less than 1M population. 1 fisherman can land a good number of salmon, steelheads easy. But as population grew and living standards change, more and more people takes up golfing, fishing, and other outdoor activities. Resources are depleted, and hatchery were placed in popularly fished rivers to 'keep' these recreational fishing population happy. In a way, because of easy access and enhanced stock, fishing catch rate are high in these rivers such as Vedder, Chehalis, Capilano... and this inturn keeps anglers from moving outside of these hatchery enhanced rivers, therefore wild stocks in other river system are safe.
Angling also started as a method of gathering food not sport. Many catch fish for food. Some like there table fare bought from market, some like to catch their own. What's wrong in keeping your catch? Some people might only get to fish once a week or may be months. They would hope to limit out what they catch, also might have large family. Some might call them meat fisherman, but those meat fisherman might also think why put pain to those 10, 20 fish when just fishing for fun or sport?
I believe so long there is enough brood stock returning to hatchery DFO will not likely to change daily catch limit in these hatchery stock enhanced rivers.